Dropcontact vs FullEnrich (France & Europe, 2026): what is the best B2B enrichment tool?

Are your emails bouncing, your mobiles ringing empty and your CRM is full of duplicates? Before accelerating outbound, data must be made reliable. This Dropcontact vs FullenRich comparison helps you choose in a real situation: a summary in 5 points, our comparison criteria, two tool sheets (strengths, limitations, lived use cases), an enrichment/compliance/precision/price table, then a mini-guide “how to choose”. Objective: for your team to know what to plug in as early as this week.

Summary in 5 points

• Positioning : Dropcontact focuses on GDPR compliance and real-time algorithmic enrichment (no resold base). FullenRich seeks maximum coverage through a waterfall of providers.
• Coverage & execution : Dropcontact is very solid France/Europe with native CRM integrations. FullenRich is agnostic and claims a find rate > 80% thanks to the cascade.
• Compliance : Dropcontact is 100% RGPD (recomposition + server tests, no stored database). FullEnrich says it is GDPR & CCPA aligned and has removed its LinkedIn extension to remain compliant.
• Precision & verification : Dropcontact checks in real time and FullEnrich highlights triple verification + multi-sources.
• prix : Dropcontact starts at around €24/month (small volumes, CRM offers). FullEnrich at $29/month, 50 free leads and cumulative credits. See table at the bottom.

Our comparison criteria

• Enrichment : nominative professional email, mobile direct, firmo/technos, organization chart.
• Compliance : RGPD/CCPA, absence of “gray” scraping, database vs algorithms, conservation.
• Precision & freshness : verification method, announced discovery rate, obsolescence.
• Integrations : HubSpot, Salesforce, Pipedrive; Zapier/make/N8N, CSV/API.
• Credits & TCO : quotas, packs, throughput to success, cost per contact reachable (not just “found”).
• Experiment : speed (batch/real time), deduplication, correction, ease of use for teams.

Dropcontact: enrichment of “algorithms and server tests”, RGPD focus

‍

What it is

Dropcontact recomposes the pro email and tests its validity in real time (servers), without storing or reselling a database. It fixes your files, merges duplicates and connects natively to HubSpot/Pipedrive /Salesforce. For an SME that wants to sleep easy on the GDPR side, this is reassuring.

Forces

• Reassuring compliance : 100% GDPR promise, no replicated database, less obsolescence.
• Useful quality : live verification, standardization of names/positions, CRM deduplication.
• Integrations : native CRM, API/CSV, automations (recurring jobs).

Limits

• Mobile Direct : not core product (rather via partners/linked tools).
• No outreach integrated (to be combined with Lemlist, LGM, etc.).

When it “sounds right”

• You mainly work in France/Europe and your CEO speaks RGPD as soon as you say “email”.
• Your CRM needs to be cleaned up (duplicates, inconsistent fields) before sending anything.
• You prefer less but reliable to more but risky.

FullenRich: multi-source “waterfall” to maximize the find

‍

What it is

FullEnrich interviews several providers in cascade to find more direct emails and mobiles. The publisher announces a rate > 80%, a rate of success and 50 free leads to test. Practical when your SDRs repeat: “we are missing emails and mobiles”.

Forces

• Aggressive coverage : waterfall emails + phones, cumulative credits, flexible plans.
• Verification : claimed triple check, CSV/API export, workflows via Zapier /Make/n8n.
• Operational : enrichment from LinkedIn URLs (after removing the extension), useful for completing lists.

Limits

• Compliance : calls itself GDPR & CCPA aligned but remains an aggregator, policing your country/persona rules internally.
• Actual cost : monitor the cost per reachable contact (valid email/mobile direct), not only the price of the pack.

When it “sounds right” (experienced)

• You are targeting international markets and looking for reachable volume (email + mobile).
• Your SDRs make a lot of calls and need direct dials at scale.
• You like to pay for the results and keep the credits rolling.

Comparative table (2026): enrichment, compliance, precision, price

Quick verdict by use case

• Priority GDPR compliance + own CRM + Europe: Dropcontact. You gain in quality and peace of mind (fewer rebounds, fewer risks).
• Reachable volume priority (emails + mobiles) + call-oriented SDR : FullenRich. You gain in coverage and reachability.
• Smart Combo : Dropcontact to standardize and clean the CRM continuously and FullEnrich to fill the holes on difficult targets or outside the EU.

FullenRich vs Dropcontact: how to choose?

• Si your committee challenges you on the RGPD, so go to Dropcontact connected to the CRM (recurring jobs, deduplication).
• Si your SDRs say “we don't have enough mobiles” so, test FullEnrich (50 free leads), measure the cost per accessible contact.
• Si you mainly operate in France/EU, so Dropcontact offers a very reassuring framework.
• Si You are doing international business with a high volume of calls, so FullenRich will save you time.
• In any case : decide after 2 weeks on a real sample (100—300 contacts/persona) by reading: valid rate, reachability, rebounds, responses.

Common mistakes to avoid

• Choose at the admission price rather than at the cost per reachable contact.
• Forget cleaning up the CRM, like Hubspot (duplicates, standardization) before outbound.
• Ignore compliance (geographic areas, sales base, consent).

‍

Method & updates

Comparison written from public sources (product pages, pricing, compliance and integration docs). We update quarterly to reflect changes (pricing, integrations, policies).

Last updated: September 2026.

Ethics & transparency clause

There is no charge for any seats. To correct information (prices, integrations, compliance), write to us: we update after verification.

‍

‍